The Book of Genesis- Demystified and Explained Part I

This video explains each verse, demystified and presented in a rational way we can now understand, as dictated face to face, by the Elohim (the scientists who created us), to the final prophet (a prophet is a messenger of the creators), whose name is Rael.

I recommend that, if you haven’t already, to visit the website http://www.Rael.org
Peace :D

Duration : 0:3:28


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

November 20 2008 03:40 pm | genesis bible

21 Responses to “The Book of Genesis- Demystified and Explained Part I”

  1. latumeten88 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    this whole video is …
    this whole video is rediculous and there is only one creator and thats god….when he says there is other gods that means god, and jesus christ….god took on the beings of a human, god, and the holy spirit. this is false teachings, and god also said that it would happen.

  2. raptor29aaa on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    I’m not sure where …
    I’m not sure where you are getting your hebrew from, but I know El like El shaddi and Elyon. Theses all start with El. Um…. Elohim is plural, but I am pretty sure, you can even wikipedia it, maybe excyclopedia britanica or visit Jerusalem and find that I think to the best of my experience that Elohim means God. I would like to believe you but my cultural experience, and references point away from your translation… sorry

  3. Tattoo1377 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    No, God was …
    No, God was substituted.
    Elohim translated from Hebrew means “Those from the Sky” not “gods from the sky”.
    Eloha is the singular which would mean “One from the sky” and not God.

  4. Tattoo1377 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    In the description, …
    In the description, it tells you were these statements originate.

  5. Tattoo1377 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    ‘This guy’ (me) …
    ‘This guy’ (me) isn’t making this up.
    In the description, it tells you were these statements originate.
    My advice, don’t take literal word for word, what primitives recorded as best they could understand.

  6. Charles2337 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    The …
    The extraterrestrials could have flown in machines, just like planes or space craft. Our ancestors had no knowledge of flight or any science, so they described them with what they could wrap their minds around; birds, wings, etc. So they drew people with wings or people sitting on clouds. In eastern religions you see people sitting on disks, and in the sumerian civilization, you see men riding a circle with wings. Sometimes even chariots of fire; could have been a rocket propelled aircraft.

  7. Charles2337 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    All the miracles …
    All the miracles and mystical stories in the bible were just the interpretation of what the primitive people were seeing at the time. They didn’t understand what they were seeing. So they labeled things that could have been technology at work, as magic or divine intervention.
    Remember there is a lot of symbolism in the bible. For example angels with wings; they would be extraterestrials who are capable of flight, so they drew them with wings.

  8. Charles2337 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    Great video. To …
    Great video. To those who are wondering where he’s getting all these ideas. Go to Rael(dot)org.

  9. demoniclordwizard on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    Well this video …
    Well this video just makes a millioin and one umptions , and errored ones at that. You have to read the sentenses , and then read the paragraph as a whole , to understand what everything is talking about. Where does this guy draw the idea that “and the light was good” means aliens studied the sun’s harmful rays , when the bible states God CREATED the sun “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” I think he skipped that sentense , LOL.

  10. ocelot16000 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    lol where the fck …
    lol where the fck did you get this ideas? ROFL

  11. Tattoo1377 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    Who said anything …
    Who said anything about decoding? This isn’t some ‘Davinci Code’ video :P
    And no, I didn’t replace God with ‘a’ scientist, with a ‘Group of Scientists’.
    Think what you want, it’s your life.

  12. cw981126 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    You didnt decode …
    You didnt decode anything. You just called the idea of God a scientist. This is a crock of .

  13. Tattoo1377 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    Genesis 1:3 “God …
    Genesis 1:3 “God said Let there be light”
    The explanation of 1:4 would imply, ‘there must be light’ (for life to exist on a planet). Thus the light was tested for dangerous radiation levels, as stated in the video :)
    Peace

  14. Tattoo1377 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    Thanks for your …
    Thanks for your comment.
    The Elohim did not address this issue with Rael, they only spoke of the verses related to the story of our origin.
    I suggest you read Rael’s first book, it discusses some other things in the bible, such as Sodom and Gomorrah, the Ark and the flood, and other things..
    Peace

  15. TheBlackSunn on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    care to speak on 1: …
    care to speak on 1:3????

  16. TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    Genesis 4 :15
    Whom …

    Genesis 4 :15
    Whom did Cain and God think was going to kill him?
    Whom did Cain marry?
    Whom did Cain build a city for?

    1st commandment God admits there are other Gods!
    “Where did they come from if he made every thing”
    Did he make them ?
    Did they come from where he came?
    Did they make the people that provided Cain’s wife?

  17. DarkUmabel on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    You didn’t …
    You didn’t demystify and explain Genesis 1:3…

  18. raptor29aaa on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    Elohim is God but …
    Elohim is God but plural

  19. pwhite77 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    whats the name of …
    whats the name of this song

  20. Tattoo1377 on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    True, but I doubt …
    True, but I doubt any fundamental message was changed in these particuliar texts.
    Thanks for the response :P
    Peace!

  21. CambricFinish on 20 Nov 2008 at 3:40 pm #

    Very interesting …
    Very interesting perspective. However, some of it is based on “improperly translated” English texts.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.